The Tokina 80-200 2.8


This Tokina lens is a relatively old design. It has a rotating front element, the lens extends a bit depending on focal length and while focusing. I have bought that lens as a kind of temporary replacement. I sold my Sigma 70-200 2.8, because I didn't use the lens a lot... but after selling it, I discovered I needed the range and the speed a few times. I could find a cheap copy allowing me to wait for the moment I'll buy a 70-200VR (6 times more expensive). The lens is well built, heavy and a bit slow to focus (no internal motor). Optically speaking, it is an excellent lens but with a slight softness fully opened. Best performance starts at f4 and above.

gear 03

Pros

- can be found very cheap (compared to other similar lenses)
- optically very good
- comes with hard carrying case, and lens caps
- excellent build
- heavy and stable
- good tripod mount

Cons

- rotating front element
- no sun hood provided (screw type needed)
- AF is bit slow to recent norms
- slightly soft fully open
- pretty heavy (like most lenses in the category)

This lens is working pretty well for sports like indoor tennis (low light shooting, imposing to select a pretty high ISO value, f2.8 - fully open - very thin DOF, speed higher than 1/320 sec. Overall conclusions: recommended. Highly usable and at a very reasonable price. (I paid more than 6 times more !! for the Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR)

A few examples (tennis - Kim Clijsters)

  Clijsters Muller 08

  Clijsters Muller 03